Research Articles on Virtual Communities (P to Z)

From VC

Jump to: navigation, search



  • Paine Schofield, C. B., & Joinson, A. N. (2008). Privacy, trust, and disclosure online. In A. Barak (Ed.), Psychological aspects of cyberspace: Theory, research, applications (pp. 13-31). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. http://cyberpsych.yeda.info


  • Paolilo, J. (1999) "The Virtual Speech Community: Social Network and Language Variation on IRC." Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 4(4).

http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol4/issue4/paolillo.html


  • Parks, Malcolm R. and Kory Floyd. (1996) "Making Friends in Cyberspace." Journal of Communication 46(1), 80-97.


  • Parks, M. R., & Roberts, L. D. (1998). Making MOOsic: The development of personal relationships online and a comparison to their offline counterparts. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 517-537.

Early version available at http://depts.washington.edu/spcom/parks/moosic.htm


  • Parr, J., & Ward, L. (2006). Building on foundations: Creating an online community. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14, 775-793.


  • Pauleen, D. J., & Yoong, P. (2001). Relationship building and the use of ICT in boundary-crossing virtual teams: A facilitator’s perspective. Journal of Information Technology, 16, 205-220.


  • Perdue, P. C., (1992). Technological determinism in agrarian societies. In: Does technology drive history? The dilemma of technological determinism, (Eds. M. R. Smith and L. Marx), pp. 169-200.


  • Petropoulou, O., Lazakidou, G., Retalis, S., Vrasidas, C. (2007) Analysing interaction behaviour in network supported collaborative learning environments: a holistic approach, in: Special Issue of International Journal of Knowledge and Learning (IJKL), (http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=42&year=2007&vol=3&issue=4/5) "Learning and Interacting in the Web: Social networks and Social Software in the Web 2.0". Guest Editors: Miltiadis D. Lytras, Sheizaf Rafaeli, Stephen Downes, Ambjorn Naeve and Patricia Ordonez de Pablos. Volume 3, Nos 4/5, pp. 450-464.
  • The Pew Internet & American Life Project, (2000, May 10). Tracking online life: How women use the Internet to cultivate relationships with family and friends.


  • Pew Internet & the American Life (October 2001) "Online Communities: Networks that nurture long-distance relationships and local ties" [.pdf]


  • Phillips, W, (1996). A Comparison of Online, E-Mail, and In-Person Self-Help Groups Using Adult Children of Alcoholics as a Model.

http://www.rider.edu/users/suler/psycyber/acoa.html.


  • Pieri, M., Ceriani, C. (2005). A Methodology for Analysing Virtual Communities. Media Skills & Competence Conference. Tampere, Finland.

http://ecml.pc.unicatt.it/download/results/proceedings.pdf#page=56

  • Pinsoneault, A,Barki, H., Gallupe, R.,. & Hoppen, N. (1999). Electronic brainstorming: The illusion of productivity. Information Systems Research,10(2), 110-133


  • Plaut, S. M. (1997). Online ethics: Social contracts in the virtual community. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 22, 79-83.


  • Polak, M. (2006). It's a gURL thing: Community versus commodity in girl-focused netspace. In D. Buckingham & B. Willett (Eds.), Digital generations: Children, young people, and new media (pp. 177-191). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.


  • Poole, M. S. and G. DeSanctis, (1992). Microlevel structuration in computer-supported group decision making, Human Communication Research, 19, 5-49.


  • Postmes, Tom, Russell Spears and Martin Lea. (1998). "Breaching or Building Social Boundaries?: SIDE-effects of Computer-Mediated Communication." Communication Research 25, 689-715.


  • Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Lea, M. (2000). The formation of group norms in computer-mediated communication. Human Communication Research, 26(3), 341-371.


  • Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Lea, M. (2002). Intergroup differentiation in computer-mediated communication: Effects of depersonalization. Group Dynamics, 6, 3-16.


  • Postmes, T., Spears, R., Sakhel, K., & De Groot, D. (2001). Social influence in computer-mediated communication: The effects of anonymity on group behavior. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1243-1254.



  • Preece, J. and K. Ghozati, (1998). In Search of Empathy Online: A Review of 100 Online Communities, In: Proceedings of the 1998 Association for Information Systems Americas Conference, pp. 92-94.


  • Preece, J. (1999). Empathic communities: Balancing emotional and factual communication. Interacting with Computers, 12, 63-67.


  • Preece, J. (2001). Sociability and usability in online communities: Determining and measuring success. Behavior & Information Technology, 20, 347-356.


  • Preece, J., Nonnecke, B., & Andrews, D. (2004). The top five reasons for lurking: improving community experiences for everyone. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 201-223.


  • Putnam, Robert, "Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital," Journal of Democracy 6(1) (January 1995), 65-78.

Available at http://www.jodyb.net/school/putnam.html


  • Quan-Haase, A., Wellman, B., Witte, J. C., & Hamptom, K. N. (2002). Social contact, civic engagement, and sense of community. In B. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet in Everyday Life (pp. 291-324). Malden, MA: Blackwell.


  • Quandt, J., (1966). On the size distribution of firms. American Economic Review, Vol. 36 (August), pp. 624-637.


  • Raban, D.R. and Rafaeli, S. (2006) The Effect of Source Nature and Status on the Subjective Value of Information Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology ( JASIST ), Volume 57, Issue 3 (p 321-329)


  • Rafaeli, S., (1984). If the computer is the medium, what is the message: Explicating interactivity, In: Annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Honolulu, Hawaii.


  • Rafaeli, S., (1986). The electronic bulletin board: A computer driven mass medium, Computers and the Social Sciences, 2, 123-36.

http://cis519dhm.bus.umich.edu/RafaeliElectronicBulletinBoard.pdf


  • Rafaeli, S., (1988) Interactivity: From new media to communication. In: Sage Annual Review of Communication Research: Advancing Communication Science, Vol. 16, Sage, Beverly Hills, pp. 110-134.

Available: http://gsb.haifa.ac.il/~sheizaf/interactivity/


  • Rafaeli, S., (1990a). Interacting with media: Para-social interaction and real interaction. In: Information and Behavior, Vol. 3 (Eds. B. D. Ruben and L. Lievrouw), Transaction Publishers, pp. 125-181.


  • Rafaeli, S., (1990b). Review of Chesebro, J and Bonsall, D, "Computer-mediated communication: Human relationships in a computerized world", Journal of Communication, 37(3), 152-155.


  • Rafaeli, S. and Ariel, Y. (2007) "Assessing Interactivity in Computer-Mediated Research", in Joinson, A.N., McKenna, K.Y.A., Postmes, T. and Rieps, U.D. (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology , Oxford University Press, (Chapter 6, pp. 71-88) 2007

http://gsb.haifa.ac.il/~sheizaf/Interactivity_Rafaeli&Ariel.pdf



  • Rafaeli, S. and R. LaRose, (1991). Audience activity and participation in electronic bulletin boards: A national survey, In: Annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Chicago, IL.


  • Rafaeli, S. and L. D. Ritchie, (1991). On the value of information, In: Annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Chicago.


  • Rafaeli, S. and R. J. LaRose, (1993). Electronic bulletin boards and 'public goods' explanations of collaborative mass media., Communication Research, 20(2), 277-297.


  • Rafaeli, S., M.L. McLaughlin and F. Sudweeks, 1998a. Introduction. In: Network and netplay: virtual groups on the Internet, (Eds. F. Sudweeks, M. L. McLaughlin and S. Rafaeli), The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. xv-xx.


  • Rafaeli, S. and F. Sudweeks , (1997). Networked Interactivity, Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 2(4).

http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol2/issue4/rafaeli_sudweeks.html.


  • Rafaeli, S. and Ravid, G., (1997). Online, Web-based Learning Environment for an Information System Course: Access Logs, Linearity and Performance. Paper presented at the ISECON '97, Orlando, FL USA. Available http://www.ravid.org/gilad/isecon1997.pdf


  • Rafaeli, S., et al., (1998b). Appendix: ProjectH overview: A collaborative quantitative study of computer-mediated communication. In: Network and netplay: virtual groups on the Internet, (Eds. F. Sudweeks, M. L. McLaughlin and S. Rafaeli), The MIT Press, Cambridge.


  • Rafaeli, S. & Ravid, G., (2001). Research through online simulation of team coordination, communication, and information sharing. Paper presented at the INFORMS Section on Group Decision and Negotiation and EuroGDSS Group Decision and Negotiation 2001,La Rochelle, France.

Available: http://www.ravid.org/gilad/gdn2001.pdf


  • Rafaeli, S., Ravid, G., & Soroka, V., (2004). De-lurking in virtual communities: a social communication network approach to measuring the effects of social and cultural capital, Proceedings of the 2004 Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 37) Collaboration Systems and Technology Track. Copyright 2004 IEEE. Published in the Proceedings of the Hawai'i International Conference on System Sciences, January 5 ? 8, 2004, Big Island, Hawaii.



  • Rafaeli, Sheizaf., & Ariel, Yaron. (October, 2005). "Interactivity and the Subjective Value of Information". Paper presented at Internet Research 6.0: Internet Generations, , Chicago, IL, United States of America.


  • Rafaeli, Sheizaf., Hayat, Tsahi & Ariel, Yaron. (2005). "Wikipedia Community: Users' Motivations and Knowledge Building". Presented at Cyberculture 3rd Global Conference. Thursday 11th-13th August 2005 Prague, Czech Republic


  • Rafaeli, Sheizaf., Hayat, Tsahi & Ariel, Yaron. (2005). "Wikipedians' sense of community, motivations, and knowledge building: a cross-cultural study" Proceedings of Wikimania 2005 - The First International Wikimedia Conference. 4th-7th August 2005 Frankfurt, Germany



  • Rafaeli.S & Schoberth.T & Heintz. A (2004) Relation & attributive Activity in Virtual Community. 
http://bibserv7.bib.uni-mannheim.de/madoc/volltexte/2005/988/pdf/abwl_13_04.pdf




  • Rao, V.S. and S.L. Jarvenpaa, (1991.) Computer support of groups: Theory-based models for GDSS research, Management Science, 37(10), 1347-1362.


  • Rashid, A. M., Ling, K., Tassone, R.D., Resnick, P., Kraut, R.E., & Riedl J. (2006). Motivating Participation by Displaying the Value of Contribution. in ACM

Conference on Computer Human Interaction (CHI). Montreal, Canada.


  • Ravid, G., & Rafaeli, S., (2000). Multi Player, Internet and Java-Based Simulation Games: Learning and Research in Implementing a Computerized Version of the "Beer-Distribution Supply Chain Game. Paper presented at the Web-Based Modeling and Simulation WEBSIM 2000, San Diago, CL USA. Available: http://www.ravid.org/gilad/websim2000.pdf


  • Ravid, G. and Rafaeli, S., (2004). Small World and Scale Free: An Investigation of Online A-Synchronous Groups, paper presented at the January 2004 annual Moach (Mind) Conference on Computers and Education, Israel.


  • Ravid, G., Bar-Ilan, J., Rafaeli, S. and Baruchson-Arbib, S. (2006), Analysis of Queries Reaching SHIL on the Web - An Information System Providing Citizen Information, in O. Etzion, T. Kuflik, and A. Motro (Eds.): NGITS 2006, LNCS 4032, pp. 26 - 37, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg 2006. available http://rafaeli.net/publications/RavidBarIlanRafaeliNGITSShil.pdf


  • Reid, E. (1999). Hierarchy and power. In M. A. Smith & P. Kollock (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 108-133). London: Routledge.


  • Reid, E., (1991). Electropolis: Communication and Community on Internet Relay Chat. Honours Dissertation, University of Melbourne.

http://www.irchelp.org/irchelp/communication-research/academic/academic-reid-e-electropolis-(1991)html



  • Reips, U.-D. (2008). How Internet-mediated research changes science. In A. Barak (Ed.), Psychological aspects of cyberspace: Theory, research, applications (pp. 268-294). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. http://cyberpsych.yeda.info


  • Regan, T., (2003). Weblogs threaten and inform traditional journalism. [Electronic version]. Nieman Reports 57(3), 68-70.

http://www.nieman.harvard.edu/reports/03-3NRfall/V57N3.pdf

  • Ren, Y. Q., Kraut, R., & Kiesier, S. (2007). Applying common identity and bond theory to design of online communities. Organization Studies, 28, 377-408.


  • Resnick, P. and Varian; H.R., (1997). Recommender systems, Communications of the ACM, 40(3), 56-58.


  • Rheingold, H., (1993). The virtual community. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.


  • Rheingold, H. (2000). Community development in the cyberspace of the future. In D. Gauntlett (Ed.), Web studies: Rewiring media studies for the digital age (pp. 170-178). New York: Oxford University Press.



  • Rheingold's (2002) SmartMobs book, bibliography and website


  • Rice, R.E., (1982). Communication Networking in Computer-Conferencing Systems: A Longitudinal Study of Group Roles and System Structure. Communication Yearbook, Vol. 6, Beverly Hill, CA: Sage, pp. 925-944.


  • Rice, R.E., (1988). Issues and concepts in research on computer-mediated communication systems. In: Communication Yearbook, Vol. 12 (Ed. J. A. Anderson), Sage, pp. 436-476.


  • Rice, R. E. and C. Aydin, (1991.) Attitudes toward new organizational technology: Network proximity as a mechanism for social information processing, Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 219-244.


  • Rice, Ronald E., and Donald Case., (1983). "Electronic Message Systems in The University: A Description of Use and Utility." Journal of Communication 33(1), 131-52.


  • Rice, R.E., Grant, August E., Schmitz, Joseph, and Torobin, Jack, (1990). Individual and Network Influences on the Adoption and Perceived Outcomes of Electronic Messaging. Social Networks, Vol. 12, p. 27-55.


  • Rice, Ronald E. and Love, Gail, (1987). Electronic Emotion: Socioemotional Content in a Computer-Mediated Communication Network. Communication Research, Vol. 1491), pp. 85- 108.


  • Rintel, E. S. & Pittam, J., (1997). "Strangers in a Strange Land: Interaction Management on Internet Relay Chat." Human Communication Research 23(4), 507 - 534



  • Riva, G. (2001). From real to virtual communities: Cognition, knowledge, and intention in the World Wide Web. In C. R. Wolfe (Ed.), Learning and teaching on the World Wide Web (pp. 131-151). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.


  • Roberts, Teresa L., (1998). Are newsgroups virtual communities? Proceedings of CHI'98, Los Angeles, CA.


  • Roberts, L. D., Smith, L. M., & Pollock, C. (2002). MOOing till the cows come home: The search for sense of community in virtual environments. In A. T. Fisher, C. Sonn, & B. J. Bishop (Eds.), Psychological sense of community: Research, applications and implications (pp. 223-245). New York, US: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.


  • Rodino, M., (1997). "Breaking out of Binaries: Reconceptualizing Gender and its Relationship to Language in Computer-Mediated Communication." Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 3(3).

http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue3/rodino.html


  • Rogers, P., & Lea, M. (2004). Cohesion in online groups. In K. Morgan, C. A. Brebbia, J. Sanchez & A. Voiskounsky (Eds.), Human perspectives in the Internet society: Culture, psychology and gender (pp. 115-124). Southampton, UK: WIT press.


  • Rojo, Alejandra and Ronald G. Ragsdale, (1997a). A Process Perspective on Participation in Scholarly Electronic Forums, Science Communication, Vol. 18(4, June), 320-341.


  • Rojo, Alejandra and Ronald G. Ragsdale, (1997b). Participation in electronic forums: Implications for the design, Telematics and Informatics, 14(1), 83-96.


  • Rojo, Alejandra (1995). Participation in scholarly electronic forums. Unpublished Phd. Disseration, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada [1]


  • Romm, C. T. and N. Pliskin, (1997). The Impact of E-mail on the Evolution of a Virtual Community During a Strike, Information & Management, 32, 245-254.


  • Romm, C. T. and N. Pliskin, (1999). The Office Tyrant: Social Control Through E-Mail, Information, Technology, and People, 12(1), 27-43.


  • Rovai, A. P., & Gallien, L. B., Jr. (2005). Learning and sense of community: A comparative analysis of African American and Caucasian online graduate students. Journal of Negro Education, 74, 53-62.


  • Russ, G. S., R. L. Daft and R. H. Lengel, (1990). Media selection and managerial characteristics in organizational communications, Management Communication Quarterly, 4, 151-175.


  • Rutkowski, A. F., Vogel, D., Bemelmans, T. M. A., & Van Genuchten, M. (2002). Group support systems and virtual collaboration: The HKNET project. Group Decision & Negotiation, 11, 101-125.


  • Sack, W., (2000). Discourse Diagrams: Interface Design for Very Large-Scale Conversations, In: Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE Computer Society, Maui Hawaii.



  • Sanger, L., (2004). Why Wikipedia Must Jettison Its Anti-Elitism, Kuro5hin.

on http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2004/12/30/142458/25


  • Sassenberg, K. (2002). Common bond and common identity groups on the Internet: Attachment and normative behavior in on-topic and off-topic chats. Group Dynamics, 6, 27-37.


  • Saunders C, Robey, D., and Vaverek, K., (1994). The persistence of status differentials in computer conferencing. Human Communication Research, Vol. 20, pp. 443-472.


  • Savicki, V., & Kelley, M. (2000). Computer mediated communication: Gender and group composition. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3, 817-826.


  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C., (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of The Learning Sciences, 3, 265-283.


  • Schmitz, J., (1997). Structural relations, electronic media and social change: The public electronic network and the homeless. In: Virtual culture: Identity and communication in cybersociety, (Ed. S. G. Jones), Sage, London, pp. 80-101.


  • Schmitz, J. and J. Fulk, (1991). Organizational colleagues, media richness, and electronic mail: A test of the social influence model, Communication Research, 18, 487-523.


  • Schneider, S. J., Kerwin, J., Frechtling, J., & Vivari, B. A. (2002). Characteristics of the discussion in online and face-to-face focus groups. Social Science Computer Review, 20, 31-42.



  • Schuler, Doug., (1997). What Kind of Platform for Change?, Presentation at Community Space and Cyber Space conference, Seattle.

http://www.scn.org/ip/cpsr/diac/platform.htm


  • Schwarz, H., Nardi, B., and Whittaker, S., (1999). The hidden work in virtual work., In: In International Conference on Critical Management.


  • Schwartzman, R. (2006). Virtual group problem solving in the basic communication course: Lessons for online learning. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 33, 3-14.


  • Schweitzer, N. J. (2008). Wikipedia and psychology: Coverage of concepts and its use by undergraduate students. Teaching of Psychology, 35, 81-85.



  • Scott, P. J., Castaneda, L.J., Quick, K. A., Linney, J. (2007). Trialogical learning in public: FlashMeeting recording and reuse in a peer-learning context, in: Special Issue of International Journal of Knowledge and Learning (IJKL), (http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=42&year=2007&vol=3&issue=4/5) "Learning and Interacting in the Web: Social networks and Social Software in the Web 2.0". Guest Editors: Miltiadis D. Lytras, Sheizaf Rafaeli, Stephen Downes, Ambjorn Naeve and Patricia Ordonez de Pablos. Volume 3, Nos 4/5, pp. 529-541.


  • Scranton, P, (1992). Determinism and indeterminism in the history of technology. In: Does technology drive history? The dilemma of technological determinism, (Eds. M. R. Smith and L. Marx), pp. 143-168.



  • Shah, D. V., McLeod, J. M., & Yoon, S. (2001). Communication, context and community: An exploration of print, broadcast and Internet influences. Communication Research, 28, 464-506.



  • Shannon, C.L. and W. Weaver, (1949). The mathematical theory of communication, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL.


  • Shapiro, J. S., (1999). Loneliness: Paradox or artifact? The American Psychologist, 54(9), 782- 783.


  • Shepard, Morgan M., et al., (1995). Social loafing in electronic brainstorming: Invoking social comparision through technology and facilitation techniques to improve group productivity, In: Proceedings of the 28th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE.


  • Short, L. M., Surprenant, Z. J., & Harris, J. M. (2006). A community-based trial of an online intimate partner violence CME program. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 30, 181-185.


  • Sillence, E., & Baber, C. (2004). Integrated digital communities: Combining Web-based interaction with text messaging to develop a system for encouraging group communication and competition. Interacting with Computers, 16, 93-113.


  • Silverman, T. (2001). Expanding community: The Internet and relational theory. Community, Work & Family, 4, 231-238.


  • Simon, H. A., (1957). Models of man (chapter 9), New York: Wiley.


  • Simon, H.A. and B. Bonini, (1958). On the size distribution of business firms. American Economic Review, pp. 607-617.


  • Skvoretz, John, (1988). Models of Participation in Status-Differentiated Groups. Social Psychology Quarterly, Vol. 51(1), pp. 43-57.


  • Smith, M.A., (1997). Measuring the Social Structure of the Usenet, Presented at Sunbelt XVI, San Diego, CA.



  • Smith, M.A., (1999). Invisible crowds in cyberspace: Mapping the social structure of the Usenet. In: Communities in cyberspace, (Eds. M. Smith and P. Kollack), Routledge, London, pp. 195-219.


  • Smith, M.,A. Farnham and S. Drucker, (2000) The social life of small graphical chat rooms, In: Computer-Human Interaction (CHI), ACM, The Hague pp. 462-469.



  • Smith, Marc A., (1997b). Netscan: Measuring and mapping the social structure of Usenet, In: 17th Annual International Sunbelt Social Network Conference, San Diego, California.


  • Smith, Marc A. and Andrew T. Fiore, (2001). Visualization components for persistent conversations, In: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 2001, 3 Issue, No1 ACM, Seattle pp. 136-143.


  • Smith, D. A. (1999). Problems of conflict management in virtual communities. In M. A. Smith & P. Kollock, (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 135-163). London: Routledge.


  • Smith, R. O. (2005). Working with difference in online collaborative groups. Adult Education Quarterly, 55, 182-199.


  • Smith, A. D. (2007). Chronic disease management and the development of virtual communities. International Journal of Electronic Healthcare, 3, 329-352.


  • Smolensky, Eugene, (1994). Lorenz Curve. In D. Greenwald (Ed.), The McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Economics (2 nd Edition). (pp. 651-653) New York: McGraw-Hill.



  • Spears, R. and M. Lea, (1992). Social influence and the influence of the 'social' in computer-mediated communication. In: Contexts of computer-mediated communication, (Ed. M. Lea), Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York, pp. 30-65.



  • Sproull, Lee., and Faraj, Samer, (1997). Atheism, Sex, and Databases: The net as a social technology. In S. Kiesler (Ed.), Culture of the Internet. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.


  • Sproull, Lee, and Kiesler, S., (1986). Reducing Social Context Cues: Electronic Mail in Organizational Communication. Management Science, Vol. 32(11), pp. 1492-1512.


  • Sproull, L., and Kiesler, S., (1990). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Boston, MA: MIT Press.


  • Steinmueller, W., (2002). "Virtual communities and the new economy," In: R. Mansell (editor). Inside the communication revolution: Evolving patterns of social and technical interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.


  • Stewart, Katerine J. (2003) Trust Transfer on the World Wide Web, ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, �

Vol. 14, No. 1, January–February 2003, pp. 5–17


  • Stone, A. R., (1991). Will the real body please stand up?: Boundary stories about virtual cultures. In: Cyberspace: First steps, (Ed. M. Benedikt), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.


  • Stone, Allucquere Rosanne, (1996). The War of Desire and Technology At the Close of the Mechanical Age, MIT Press, London.


  • Straus, S.G. and J.E. McGrath, (1994). Does the Medium Matter - the Interaction of Task Type and Technology on Group-performance and Member Reactions, Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(1), 87-97.


  • Sudweeks, Fay., (1995). Communication Patterns and Developmental Processes of Computer-Mediated and Collaborative Groups, Unpublished Manuscript.

[Online: http://www.arch.usyd.edu.au/~fay/phd/proposal.html ].


  • Sudweeks, F. and Rafaeli S., (1994). How do you get a hundred strangers to agree: Computer mediated communication and collaboration. In: Computer networking and scholarship in the 21st century university, (Eds. T. Harrison and T. D. Stephen), SUNY Press.


  • Suler, J. (2008). Cybertherapeutic theory and techniques. In A. Barak (Ed.), Psychological aspects of cyberspace: Theory, research, applications (pp. 102-128). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. http://cyberpsych.yeda.info


  • Suler, J. R., & Phillips, W. L. (1998). The bad boys of cyberspace: Deviant behavior in a multimedia chat community. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 1, 275-294.



  • Swan, K., & Shea, P. (2005). The development of virtual learning communities. In S. R. Hiltz, & R. Goldman (Eds.), Learning together online: Research on asynchronous learning networks (pp. 239-260). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.


  • Swatman, Paula. and Chin, Carolyn YP.,(2004). "The Virtual Shopping Experience: Virtual Presence as a Motivator for Online Shopping". Deakin University School of Information Systems Working Paper No. 2003/24. http://ssrn.com/abstract=630061


  • Taylor, J., & MacDonald, J. (2002). The effects of asynchronous computer-mediated group interaction on group processes. Social Science Computer Review, 20, 260-274.


  • Thorn, B.K. and T. Connolly, (1987). Discretionary databases: A theory and some experimental findings, Communication Research, 14(5 October), 512-528.


  • Thraser, Fredric M., (1927). The Gang. University of Chicago.


  • Tierney, S. (2008). Creating communities in cyberspace: Pro-anorexia web sites and social capital. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 15, 340-343.


  • Timmerman, C. E., & Scott, C. R. (2006). Virtually working: Communicative and structural predictors of media use and key outcomes in virtual work teams. Communication Monographs, 73, 108-136.


  • Tiwana, A., & Bush, A. (2001). A social exchange architecture for distributed Web communities. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5, 242-248.


  • Townsend, A.M., DeMarie, S.M. and Hendrickson, A.R., (1998). Virtual Teams: Technology and the Workplace of the Future, Academy of Management Executive, 12(3), 17-29.


  • Trevino, L. K., R. H. Lengel and R. L. Daft, (1987). Media symbolism, media richness, and media choice in organizations: A symbolic interactionist perspective, Communication Research, 14, 553-574.


  • Tucker, J. and Friedman, S. T., (1972). Population density and group size. American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 77, pp. 742-749.


  • Tufekci, Z. (2008). Can you see me now? Audience and disclosure regulation in online social network sites. Bulletin of Science Technology Society, 28, 20-36.


  • Turkle, S., (1996). Virtuality and its discontents: Searching for community in cyberspace, The American Prospect, 24, 50-57.

http://epn.org/prospect/24/24turk.html.


  • Turoff, M., et al., (1999). Collaborative discourse structures in computer mediated group communication, In: Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE, Hawaii.


  • Utz, S., (2000). Social information processing in MUDs: The development of friendships in virtual worlds. Journal of Online Behavior, 1(1).

Available at: http://www.behavior.net/JOB/v1n1/utz.html


  • Valacich, J.S., et al., (1993). Communication concurrency and the new media, Communication Research, 20(2 April), 249-276.


  • Valauskas, Edward J.' (1997). "Lex Networkia: Understanding the Internet Community." First Monday 4. (http://www.firstmonday.dk).



  • van Dolen, W., de Ruyter, K., & Carman, J. (2006). The role of self- and group-efficacy in moderated group chat. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27, 324-343.


  • Van Lange Paul A. M. ,Otten Wilma ,De Bruin Ellen M. N., Joireman Jeffrey A. (1997). Development of Prosocial, Individualistic, and Competitive Orientations: Theory and Preliminary Evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 73, No. 4



  • Vogel, D.R., Davison, R.M. and Shroff, R.H. (2001) Sociocultural Learning: A Perspective on GSS-Enabled Global Education, Communications of the AIS, 7, 9, 1-41.


  • Vogel, D.R., Davison, R.M., Shroff, R. and Qureshi, S., (2000). Sociocultural Learning in Globally Distributed Teams, Working Paper 00/03, Department of Information Systems, City University of Hong Kong.


  • Voiskounsky, A. E. (2008). Flow experience in cyberspace: Current studies and perspectives. In A. Barak (Ed.), Psychological aspects of cyberspace: Theory, research, applications (pp. 70-101). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. http://cyberspace.yeda.info


  • Wall, M. (2005). Blogs of war: weblogs as news, Journalism: theory, practice & criticism 6(2): 153-172.


  • Wall, M., (2006). Blogging Gulf war II, Journalism studies 7(1): 111-126.


  • Walther, Joseph B. 471 Things to Read About CMC. Online at [2]
  • Walther, Joseph B., (2006). "Nonverbal dynamics in computer mediated communication, or :( and the Net :('s with you, :) and you :) alone". In: The Sage Handbook of Nonverbal Communication, Manusov V. & Patterson M. (eds.). Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.


  • Walther, Joseph B., (1997). "Group and Interpersonal Effects in International Computer-Mediated Collaboration." Human Communication Research 23, 342-69.


  • Walther, Joseph B., (1996). " Computer-Mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal, and Hyperpersonal Interaction." Communication Research 23, 3-43.


  • Walther, Joseph B., (1995). " Relational Aspects of Computer-Mediated Communication: Experimental Observations Over Time." Organization Science 6, 186-203.


  • Walther, Joseph B., (1994). " Anticipated Ongoing Interaction Versus Channel Effects on Relational Communication in Computer-Mediated Interaction." Human Communication Research 20,473-501.


  • Walther, Joseph B., (1992). " Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction: A Relational Perspective." Communication Research 19, 52-90.


  • Walther, Joseph B., Jeffery F. Anderson and David W. Park., (1994). "Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction: A Meta-Analysis of Social and Antisocial Communication." Communication Research 21, 460-87.


  • Walther, Joseph B., and Judee K. Burgoon., (1992). "Relational Communication in Computer Mediated Interaction." Human Communication Research 19, 50-88.


  • Walther, J.B. and L.C. Tidwell, (1995). Nonverbal cues in computer-mediated communication, and the effect of chronemics on relational communication, Journal of Organizational Computing, 5, 355-378.


  • Walther, J. B., van der Heide, B., Kim, S.-Y., Westerman, D., & Tong, S. T. (2008). The role of friends' appearance and behavior on evaluations of individuals on facebook: Are we known by the company we keep? Human Communication Research, 34, 28-49.


  • Wang, S., & Lin, S. S. J. (2007). The effects of group composition of self-efficacy and collective efficacy on computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2256-2268.


  • Ward, K. J. (1999). Cyber-ethnography and the emergence of the virtually new community. Journal of Information Technology, 14, 95-105.


  • Warner, Keith W., (1965). Attendance and Division of Labor in Voluntary Associations. Rural Sociology, Vol. 29, 396-407.


  • Warner, W. Keith. and Hilander, James S., (1964). The Relationship between Size of Organization and Membership Participation. Rural Sociology, Vol 29, pp. 31-39.


  • Wasco, M. M., & Faraj, S., (2000). "It is what one does": Why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9(2-3), 155-173


  • Waseleski, C. (2006). Gender and the use of exclamation points in computer-mediated communication: An analysis of exclamations posted to two electronic discussion lists. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 1012-1024.


  • Watanabe, M. M. (2007). Conflict and intolerance in a Web community: Effects of a system integrating dialogues and monologues. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1020-1042.


  • Watson, Nessim., (1997). Why We Argue About Virtual Community: A Case Study of the Phish.Net Fan Community. Virtual Culture: Identity and Communication in Cybersociety. Ed. Steven G. Jones. London: Sage. 102-133.



  • Weinberg, H. (2001). Group process and group phenomena on the Internet. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 51, 361-378.


  • Weinberg, H. (2002). Community unconscious on the Internet. Group Analysis, 35, 165-183.


  • Weinreich, F., (1997). Establishing a point of view towards virtual communities, Computer-Mediated Communication Magazine [Online], 3(2).

http://www.december.com/cmc/mag/1997/feb/wein.html.


  • Weisband, S., & Atwater, L. (1999). Evaluating self and others in electronic and face-to-face groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 632-639.


  • Weisband, Suzanne P., Schneider, Sherry K., and Connolly, Terry, (1995). Computer Mediated Communication and Social Information: Status Salience and Status Differences. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 38(4), pp. 1124-1151.


  • Wellman, B., & Gulia, M. (1999). Virtual communities as communities. In M. A. Smith & P. Kollock, (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 167-194). London: Routledge.


  • Wellman, B., Haase,A. Q., Witte, J., & Hampton, K. (2001). does the Internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? Social networks, participation, and community commitment. American Behavior Scientist, 45, 436-455.


  • Wellman, Barry, (1996). For a social network analysis of computer networks: A Sociological perspective on collaborative work and virtual community, In: SIGCPR/ SIGMIS '96, ACM, Denver Colorado USA.


  • Wellman, B., (2001). Computer Networks As Social Networks, SCIENCE Vol 293(14), SEPTEMBER 2001


  • Wellman, B., (2001). Physical Place and Cyber Place: The Rise of Networked Individualism, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25.


  • Wellman, B., P. Carrington and A. Hall, (1988). Networks as personal communities. In: Social sructures: A network approach, (Ed. Wellman B.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.


  • Wellman, B., & Tindall, D., (1993). Reach out and touch some bodies: How social networks connect telephone networks. Progress in Communication Sciences, 12, 63-93.


  • Wellman, Barry & Janet Salaff, Dimitrina Dimitrova, Laura Garton, Milena Gulia and Caroline Haythornthwaite, (1996). Computer Networks as Social Networks: Collaborative Work, Telework, and Virtual Community, Annual Review of Sociology 22, 213-38


  • Barry Wellman, Barry, & Anabel Quan Haase James Witte , Keith Hampton, (2001). To be published in the special issue on “The Internet in Everyday Life” American Behavioral Scientist, vol 45, November, 2001 Does the Internet Increase, Decrease, or Supplement Social Capital? Social Networks, Participation, and Community Commitment.

http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~wellman/publications/index.html


  • Wellman, B., & Gulia, M., (1999). Net surfers don't ride alone. In B. Wellman (Ed.), Networks in the global village (pp. 331-366). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.



  • Wellman, Barry, (1997). An electronic group is virtually a social network. . In S. Kiesler (Ed.), Culture of the Internet. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.


  • Wellman, B, (2005) Community: From neighborhood to network. communication of the acm , 48 (10), 53-57.


  • Welser, H.T., Gleave, E., Fisher, D., & Smith, M. (2007). Visualizing the Signatures of

Social Roles in Online Discussion Groups. The Journal of Social Structure, 8(2). http://www.cmu.edu/joss/content/articles/volume8/Welser/


  • Wenger, Etienne, (1999-2002). Supporting Communities of Practice: A Survey of Community Oriented Technologies, available as Zip file and from http://www.ewenger.com/


  • Whittaker, S., (1996). Talking to strangers: An evaluation of the factors affecting electronic collaboration, In: CSCW '96, ACM, Cambridge, MA pp. 409-418.


  • Whittaker, S. and C. Sidner, (1996). Email overload: Exploring personal information management of mail, In: CHI96, ACM Press, pp. 276-.


  • Whittaker, S., and Hirschberg, J., (in press). The character, value and management of paper archives., Transactions on Computer Human Interaction.


  • Whittaker, S. and Schwarz, H., (1995). Back to the future: pen and paper technology supports complex group coordination. In Proceedings of CHI'95 Conference on Computer Human Interaction, NY: ACM Press, 495-502.


  • Whittaker, S., and Schwarz, H. (1999). Meetings of the board: the impact of scheduling medium on long term coordination in software development. In Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 8, 175-205.


  • Whittaker, S. and Sidner, C., (1996b). Email overload: exploring personal information management of email., In: CHI'96 Conference on Computer Human Interaction, ACM Press, NY pp. 276-283.


  • Whittaker, S., Frohlich, D., and Daly-Jones, O., (1994). Informal communication: what is it like and how might we support it?, In: CHI'94 Conference on Computer Human Interaction, ACM Press, Boston pp. 130-137.


  • Whittaker, S., Swanson, G., Kucan, J., & Sidner, C., (1997). Telenotes: managing lightweight interactions in the desktop., Transactions on Computer Human Interaction, 4, 137-168.


  • Whittaker, S., et al., (1998). The dynamics of mass interaction, In: CSCW 98, ACM Press, Seattle pp. 257-264.


  • Whittaker, S., Terveen, L., and Nardi, B. (in press). Let's stop pushing the envelope and start addressing it: a reference task agenda for HCI, Human Computer Interaction. In Press


  • Whitty, M. T., & Fisher, W. A. (2008). The sexy side of the internet: An examination of sexual activities and materials in cyberspace. In A. Barak (Ed.), Psychological aspects of cyberspace: Theory, research, applications (pp. 185-208). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. http://cybersych.yeda.info



  • Wilbur, S. P., (1997). An archeology of cyberspaces: Virtuality, community, identity. In: Internet culture, (Ed. D. Porter), Routledge, New York, NY.


  • Wilderom, Celeste P. M. and Miner, John B., (1991). Defining Voluntary Groups and Agencies within. Organization Science, Vol. 2(4), pp. 366-378.


  • Williams, Ederyn., (1977). "Experimental Comparisons of Face-to-Face and Mediated Communication: A Review." Psychological Bulletin 84, 963-76.


  • Williams, Ruth L. and Joseph Cothrel., (2000). Four smart ways to run online communities. Sloan Management Review, summer, 81-91.


  • Wilson, S. M., & Peterson, L. C. (2002). The anthropology of online communities. Annual Review of Anthropology, 31, 449-467. [3]



  • Wise, K., Hamman, B., & Thorson, K. (2006). Moderation, response rate, and message interactivity: Features of online communities and their effects on intent to participate. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 24-41.



  • Yablon, Y. B., & Katz, Y. J. (2001). Internet-based group relations: A high school peace education project in Israel. Educational Media International, 38, 175-182.


  • Ybarra, M. L., & Mitchell, K. J. (2008). How risky are social networking sites? A comparison of places online where youth sexual solicitation and harassment occurs. Pediatrics, 121, 350-357.
  • Yamagishi, T., Cook, K. S. (1993). Generalized Exchange and Social Dilemmas. Social Psychology Quarterly, vol. 56 (4), 235-248


  • Yee, N., Bailenson, J. N., Urbanek, M., Chang, F., & Merget, D. (2007). The unbearable likeness of being digital: The persistence of nonverbal social norms in online virtual environments. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10, 115-121.


  • Yoo, Y., & Kanawattanachai, P. (2001). Developments of transactive memory systems and collective mind in virtual teams. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 9, 187-208.


  • Yu, C.-P., & Young, M.-L. (2008). The virtual group identification process: A virtual educational community case. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11, 87-90.


  • Zack, Michael., H., (1993). Interactivity and Communication Mode Choice in Ongoing Management Groups., Information Systems Research, 4(3), 207-239.


  • Zaho, S., (2006). Do Internet Users Have More Social Ties? A Call for Diffrentiated Analyses of Internet Use. Journal of Computer - Mediated Communication, 11(3).


  • Zrebiec, J. F. (2005). Internet communities: Do they improve coping with diabetes? Diabetes Educator, 31, 825-836.


  • עולמות וירטואליים וקהילות וירטואליות:תקשורת בין המינים בעולם וירטואלי-מאת יעל רוזין

[4]


  • ברק, ע' ולביא, ש'. "קבוצת תמיכה מקוונת: שיטה חדשה להתערבות ייעוצית". הייעוץ החינוכי, 8 (1999), 54-68.


  • Zenhausern, Robert and Wong, Florence, (1997). Virtual Personality of a List: A Preliminary Examination of the Demography of Interent Lists. In Sudsweeks, McLaughlin, and Rafaeli (Eds.) Network and Netplay: Virtual Groups on the Internet. Cambridge, MA: AAAI/MIT Press.
  • הקרב הבא על זכויות היוצרים? 
מאת ג'ון ביגס, "ניו יורק טיימס"

[5]

  • Paying through the mouse

May 20th 2004 | SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA From The Economist print edition http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=2693526

  • Avonex, the pharma company achieved its ROI by building community sites. Braun Consulting helped produce Avonex. com, Biogen's branded site, and MSActiveSource.com, an unbranded site. Both generated a positive ROI.

[6]


  • Building Business Value Through “Communities of Practice”

More and more companies are taking the time to think together and share knowledge from remote corners of the globe. By Jenny Ambrozek and Lynne Bundesen Ambrozek [7]



Retrieved from "http://www.wsefer.com/VC/index.php/Research_Articles_on_Virtual_Communities_%28P_to_Z%29"
Personal tools