Research Articles on Virtual Communities (E to I)

From VC

Jump to: navigation, search

  • Easton, George K., et al., (1990). Using two different electronic meeting system tools for the same task: An experimental comparison, Journal of Management Information Systems, 7(1), 85-100.


  • Eick, S.G. and G.J. Wills, (1993). Navigating Large Networks with Hierarchies, In: Visualization '93 Conference Proceedings, San Jose, CA.


  • Ein-Dor, P. and E. Segev, (1991). The Phylogeny of Information Systems, The Israel Institute of Business Research, Working Paper no. 2/91.


  • Ein-Dor, Phillip and Eli Segev, (1993). A classification of information systems: Analysis and interpretation, Information Systems Research, 4(2 June), 166-204.


  • Eisenstein, E.L., (1980). The printing press as an agent of change. Communications and cultural transformations in early-modern Europe, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.


  • Ekeblad, E., (1999). The emergence and decay of multilogue: Self regulation of a scholarly mailnglist, In: European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI), Sweden.


  • Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of facebook "Friends:" Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143-1168.



  • Erickson, T., (1997). Social interaction on the Net: Virtual community as participatory genre, In: Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science, 6 (Eds, J. Nunamaker, J. F. and J. Sprague, R. H.) IEEE Computer Society Press, Hawaii pp. 23-30.


  • Erickson, T., (1999a). Making Sense of Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC): Conversations as Genres, CMC Systems as Genre Ecologies, In: Proceedings of the Thirty Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, IEEE Press.


  • Erickson, T., (1999b). Rhyme and Punishment: The Creation and Enforcement of Conventions in an On-Line Participatory Genre, In: Proceedings of the Thirty Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, IEEE Press.


  • Erickson, T. and M.R. Laff, (2001). The Design of the 'Babble' Timeline: A social Proxy for Visualizing Group Activity Over Time, In: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, No 3., Issue No. 1 ACM, Seattle.


  • Fairbrother, H.A, Hohne, E.A., Todd, S., (1999). AT&T Chat 'N Talk: Getting to know you without getting to know all about you, In: 5th Conference on Human Factors and the Web, Gaithersburg, Maryland.


  • Faraj, S., and Sproull, L., (1994). Interaction dynamics in electronic groups. Unpublished manuscript, Boston University, Boston.


  • Farooq, U., Ganoe, C. H., Xiao, L., Merkel, C. B., Rosson, M. B., & Carroll, J. M. (2007). Supporting community-based learning: Case study of a geographical community organization designing its website. Behaviour & Information Technology, 26, 5-21.


  • Faloutsos, M., P. Faloutsos and C. Faloutsos, (1999). On power-law relationships of the Internet topology, Computer Communication Review, 29(4), 251-262.



  • Feldman, Martha S. and James G. March, (1981). Information in organization as signal and symbol, Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 171-186.


  • Felten Edward W., (2004). When Wikipedia Converges, Freedom to Tinker.

http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/archives/000676.html


  • Fernback, Jan and Thompson, Brad., (1995). Computer-Mediated Communication and the American Collectivity: The Dimensions of Community Within Cyberspace. Presentation at the annual convention of the International Communication Association, Albuquerque, New Mexico. See http://www.well.com/user/hlr/texts/VCcivil.html



  • Fetzer, J.H., (1983). Probability and objectivity in deterministic and indeterministic situations, Synthese, 57, (367-86).


  • Feyerabend, P, (1975). Against method, Verso, London.


  • Figallo, C., (1998) Hosting Web communities: Building relationships, increasing customer loyalty and maintaining a competitive edge, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.


  • Finholt, T., and Sproull, L., (1990). Electronic Groups at Work. Organization Science, 1(1), 41-64.


  • Fjermestad, J. and S.R. Hiltz, (1997). Experimental studies of group decision support systems: An assessment of variables studied and methodology, IEEE Proceedings of the 30th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 45-65.


  • Fjermestad, Jery, (1998). In GSS research how many groups per treatment are enough?, In: Association for Information Systems, AMERICAS CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, pp. 477-480.


  • Flake, G., S. Lawrence and C.L. Giles, (2000). Efficient identification of web communities, In: Sixth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, ACM Inc, Boston, MA pp. 150-160.


  • Flanagin, A.J., & Metzger, M., (2001). Internet use in the contemporary media environment. Human Computer Research, 27, 153-181.


  • Flanagin, A. J., Tiyaamornwong, V., O’Connor, J., & Seibold, D. R. (2002). Computer-mediated group work: The interaction of member sex and anonymity. Communication Research, 29, 66-93.


  • Flanagin, A.J. (2005). IM Online: Instant Messaging Use Among College Students. Communication Research Reports, 22 (3), pp. 175-187.


  • Fletcher, R.J., (1977). Settlement studies (micro and semi-micro). In: Spatial Archaelology, (Ed. D. L. Clarke), Academic Press, New York, pp. 47-162.


  • Fletcher, R.J., (1986). Settlement archaeology: world-wide comparisons, World Archaeology, 18(1), 59-83.


  • Fletcher, R.J., (1991). Very large mobile communities: interaction stress and residential dispersal. In: Ethno archaeological Approaches to Mobile Campsites: hunter-gather and pastoralist case studies, (Eds. C. Gamble and B.Boismer), Ann Arbor, pp. 395-420.


  • Fletcher, R.J., (1995). The limits of settlement growth: A theoretical outline, Cambridge University Press.


  • Foltz, F., & Foltz, F. (2003). Religion on the Internet: Community and virtual existence. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 23, 321-330.


  • Forrester, Jay, (1969). Urban Dynamics, The M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass.


  • Forrester, Jay W., (1971). Counterintuitive behavior of social systems, Technology Review, 73(3 January), 1-16.


  • Forster, P. M. (2004). Psychological sense of community in groups on the Internet. Behaviour Change, 21, 141-146.


  • Forsyth, Danelson R., (1990). Group Dynamics (2nd. Ed.) Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.


  • Forte, A., & Bruckman, A., (2005). Why Do People Write for Wikipedia? Incentives to Contribute to Open-Content Publishing. Group05, Florida. http://jellis.net/research/group2005/papers/forteBruckmanIncentivesGroup.pdf
  • Franz, Heike, (1999). The impact of computer mediated communication on information overload in distributed teams, In: Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE, Hawaii pp. 1-15.


  • Francisco, V. T., Fawcett, S. B., Schultz, J. A., Berkowitz. B., Wolff, T. J., & Nagy, G. (2001). Using Internet-based resources to build community capacity: The community tool box [1]. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29, 293-300


  • Freeman, Linton C., (1984). The Impact of Computer-Based Communication on the Social Structure of an Emerging Scientific Specialty. Social Networks, Vol. 6, pp. 201-221.


  • Friedman E. J., and Resnick P., (2001). ‘The social cost of cheap pseudonyms’, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 10, No 2, pp 173—199.


  • Fuchs, C. (2007). Towards a dynamic theory of virtual communities, in: Special Issue of International Journal of Knowledge and Learning (IJKL), (http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=42&year=2007&vol=3&issue=4/5) "Learning and Interacting in the Web: Social networks and Social Software in the Web 2.0". Guest Editors: Miltiadis D. Lytras, Sheizaf Rafaeli, Stephen Downes, Ambjorn Naeve and Patricia Ordonez de Pablos. Volume 3, Nos 4/5, pp. 372-403.


  • Fulk, J., J.A. Schmitz and D. Schwarz, (1992). The dynamics of context-behavior interactions in computer-mediated communication. In: Contexts of computer-mediated communication, (Ed. M. Lea), Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York, pp. 7-29.


  • Fulk, Janet, (1993). Social construction of communication technology, Academy of Management Journal, 36(5), 921-950.


  • Fulk, Janet and Brian Boyd, (1991). Emerging theories of communication in organizations, Journal of Management, 17(2), 407-446.


  • Fulk, Janet and Geraldine DeSanctis, (1995). Electronic communication and changing organization forms, Organization Science, 6(4 July-August), 337-349.


  • Fulk, Janet, et al., (1996). Connective and communal public goods in interactive communication systems, Communication Theory, 6(1 February), 60-87.


  • Fulk, Janet, et al., (1987). A social information processing model of media use in organizations, Communication Research, 14(5 October), 529-552.


  • Gajjala, R., (forthcoming November 2002). Interrogating Identities: Composing Other Cyber-spaces, International and Intercultural Communication Annual, Volume 25.


  • Gajjala, R., (forthcoming July 2002). An Interrupted Postcolonial/Feminist Cyberethnography: Complicity and Resistance in the "Cyberfield" - Feminist Media Studies.


  • Gajjala, R., (2001). Studying Feminist E-Spaces: Introducing Transnational/Postcolonial Concerns in S. Munt (Ed), TechnospacesLondon:Continuum International.


  • Gajjala, R., (2001). Cyborg Diaspora E Comunita Virtuale: SAWNET in AVATAR, rivista di antropologia e comunicazione, n.2, roma, 2001 (translated from English to Italian by Cristiana Nicotera).


  • Gajjala, R., (2000). Internet constructs of identity and ignorance: "Third-world" contexts and cyberfeminism, in Pagnucci, G., & Mauriello, N. (Eds.) (1999-2000). The future of narrative discourse: Internet constructs of literacy and identity. Works and Days,17/18 (33-36). Radhika Gajjala


  • Gallegher, Jolene, Lee Sproull and Sara Kiesler, (1998). Legitimacy, authority and community in electronic support groups., Written Communication, 15, 493-530.


  • Gallagher, J. and Y. Wang, (1999). Network effects and the impact of free goods: An analysis of the Web server market, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 3(4), 66-88. http://dsi.gsu.edu/PROCEEDS/Abs98/JGALLAU.HTM.


  • Gallant, Linde M., Gloria M. Boone, and Austin Heap (2007): Five heuristics for designing and evaluating Web–based communities,

First Monday, volume 12, number 3 (March 2007), URL: http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue12_3/gallant/index.html


  • Galegher, J., Sproull, L., & Keisler, S., (1998). Legitimacy, authority, and community in electronic support groups. Written Communication, 15, 493-530


  • Gallupe, R. Brent, et al., (1992). Electronic brainstorming and group size, Academy of Management Journal, 35(2), 350-369.


  • Garramone, Gina M., Harris, Allen C., Anderson, Ronald, (1986). Uses of Political Computer Bulletin Boards. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 325-339.


  • Garramone, Gina M., Harris, Allen, and Pizante, Gary, (1986). Predictors of Motivation to Use Computer-Mediated Political Communication Systems. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 445-457.


  • Gallupe, R.B., Dennis, A.R., Cooper, W.H., Valacich, J.S., Bastianutti, L.M., and Nunamaker, J.F. (1992). Electronic brainstorming and group size. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 35, pp. 350-369.


  • Gavin, J., Rodham, K., & Poyer, H. (2008). The Presentation of "Pro-Anorexia" in Online Group Interactions. Qualitative Health Research, 18, 325-333.


  • Geber, B., (1995). Virtual Teams, Training, 32(4), 36-42.


  • Geister, S., Konradt, U., & Hertel, G. (2006). Effects of process feedback on motivation, satisfaction, and performance in virtual teams. Small Group Research, 37, 459-489.


  • George, Joey F., et al., (1990). A study of collaborative group work with and without computer-based support, Information Systems Research, 1(4 December), 394-415.


  • Giaglis, G.M. Stefan Klein, Robert M. O'Keefe (2000) Disintermediation, Reintermediation, or Cybermediation? The Future of Intermediaries in Electronic Marketplaces
  • Gibson, D., J. Kleinberg and P. Raghaven, (1998). Inferring web communities from link topology, In: Proceedings 9th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia.


  • Ginossar, T. (2008). Online participation: A content analysis of differences in utilization of two online cancer communities by men and women, patients and family members. Health Communication, 23, 1-12.



  • Good, N., Schafer, J.B., Konstan, J., Borchers, A., Sarwar, B., Herlocker, J., and Riedl, J., (1999). Combining Collaborative Filtering with Personal Agents for Better Recommendations. In: Proceedings of the 1999 Conference of the American Association of Artifical Intelligence (AAAI-99). pp 439-446. Reprinted at: http://www.cs.umn.edu/Research/GroupLens/research.html


  • Grether's 3600 Research Essays about the Net


  • Grodzinsky, F. S., & Tavani, H. T. (2007). Online communities, democratic ideals, and the digital divide. In S. Hongladarom, & C. Ess (Eds.), Information technology ethics: Cultural perspectives (pp. 20-30). Hershey, PA, US: Idea Group.


  • Grudin, J., (1988). Why CSCW applications fail: Problems in the design and evaluation of organizational interfaces, In: Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '88), Portland OR pp. 263-278.


  • Grudin, J. and L. Palen, (1995). Why Groupware Succeeds: Discretion or Mandate?, In: Proceedings of ECSCW'95, European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 263-278.


  • Guiller, J., & Durndell, A. (2007). Students’ linguistic behaviour in online discussion groups: Does gender matter? Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2240-2255.


  • Gulia, Milena and Barry Wellman., (1998). Net Surfers Don't Ride Alone: Virtual Communities As Communities. Communities in Cyberspace, Ed. Peter Kollock and Marc Smith. New York: Routledge.


  • Guo, B., Bricout, J. C., & Huang, J. (2005). A common open space or a digital divide? A social model perspective on the online disability community in China. Disability & Society, 20, 49-66.


  • Gustafson, K. E. (2002). Join now, membership is free: Women’s Web sites and the coding of community. In M. Consaluo, & S. Paasonen (Eds.), Women & everyday uses of the Internet: Agency & identity (pp. 168-190). New York: Perer Lang Publishing.



  • Gurak, L., (1996). Toward broadening our research agenda in cyberspace: Special focus on technological determinism, CMC Magazine ( Feb).


  • Ha, Louisa, (1995). Subscriber's Behavior in Electronic Discussion Groups: A Comparison Between Academics and Practitioners. COTIM-95: Proceedings of the Conference on Telecommunications and Information Markets, Newport, RI.


  • Haas, C., (1989). Does the medium make a difference? Two studies of writing with pen and paper and with computers, Human-Computer Interaction, 4, 149-169.


  • Haas, T., (2005). From "Public Journalism" to the "Public's Journalism"? Rhetoric and reality in the discourse on weblogs, Journalism Studies, 6(3): 387-396.


  • Hadar, D., (2001). "Palit, Shakem et Atzmecha" (Refugee, rehabilitate thyself), Haaretz, Sept. 17, 2001



  • Hafner, K. and Lyon, M., (1996). The History of E-Mail.


  • Hagel, John III, and Armstrong, Arthur G., (1997). net.gain: Expanding markets through virtual communities. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.


  • Hakonen, H. Kaukoranta, T. & Smed, J., (2002). "Aspects of networking in multiplayer computer games". The Elctronic Library. Vol 20(2), pp.87-97.

http://www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/viewContentItem.do?contentType=Article&contentId=861953


  • Hamman, Robin., (1999). "Computer Networks Linking Network Communities: A Study of the Effects of Computer Network Use Upon Pre-existing Communities." Forthcoming in Virtuelle Gruppen - Charakteristika und Problemdimensionen, Edited by Udo Thiedeke. Westdeutscher Verlag GmbH, Opladen/Wiesbaden: Germany. http://www.cybersoc.com/mphil/short.html


  • Hare, A. Paul, Blumberg, Herbert H., Davies, Martin F., and Kent, M. Valerie, (1994). Small Group Research: A Handbook. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.


  • Hargittai, E. (2007). A framework for studying differences in people's digital media uses. In N. K. a. H.-U. Otto (Ed.), Cyberworld Unlimited? (pp. 121-137). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften/GWV Fachverlage GmbH.
  • Hargittai, E., & Hinnant, A. (2005, March). New dimensions of the digital divide: Differences in young adults' use of the Internet. Paper presented at the Eastern Sociological Society, Washington, D.C.
  • Hargittai, E., & Shafer, S. (2006). Differences in actual and perceived online skills: The role of gender. Social Science Quarterly, 87 (2), 432-448.




  • Harrison, S. and P. Dourish, (1996). Re-place-ing space: The roles of place and space in collaborative systems, In: Computer Supported Collaborative Work, ACM, Cambridge, MA pp. 67-76.


  • Haythornthwaite, C. (2007). Social networks and online community. In A. Joinson, K. McKenna, T. Postmes & U. Reips (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Internet psychology (pp. 121-138). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.


  • Herring (Eds.) Computer Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social, and Cross-Cultural Perspectives, Philadelphia: John Benjamin Publishing, (pp.226-242).


  • Herring, S., (1999). "Interactional Coherence in CMC", Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 4(4).

http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol4/issue4/herring.html


  • Herring and Emigh, (2005) Collaborative Authoring on the Web: A Genre Analysis of Online Encyclopedias

(WIkipedia vs. Everything2 linguistic study) http://blog.lib.umn.edu/kenne329/wikibiblio/

  • Hewson, C. (2008). Internet-mediated research as an emergent method and its potential role in facilitating mixed methods research. In S. N.

Hesse-Biber, & P. Leavy (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 543-570). New York: Guilford Press.

  • Hewson, C. (2007). Gathering data on the

Internet: Qualitative approaches and possibilities for mixed methods and research. In A. Joinson, K. McKenna, T. Postmes & U.-D. Reips (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Internet psychology (pp. 405-428). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.


  • Hill, Gayle., (1982). Group versus individual performance: Are N+1 heads better than one?, Psychological Bulletin, 91(3), 517-539



  • Hillery, G.A., (1955). Definitions of Community: areas of agreement, Rural Socioology, 20.


  • Hiltz, S.R. and M. Turoff, (1981). The evolution of user behavior in a computerized conferencing system, Communications of the ACM, 24(11 November), 739-751.


  • Hiltz, S.R. and M. Turoff, (1985). Structuring computer-mediated communication systems to avoid information overload, Communications of the ACM, 28(7 July).


  • Hiltz, S.R. and B. Wellman, (1997). Asynchronous learning networks as a virtual classroom, Communications of the ACM, 40(9 September), 44-49.


  • Hinner, K., (2000). "Statistics of Major IRC Networks: Methods and Summary of User Count." . M/C: A Journal of Media and Culture 3(4).

http://www.api-network.com/mc/0008/count.html


  • Hiltz, Starr Roxanne, Kenneth Johnson and Murray Turoff., (1986). "Experiments in Group Decision Making: Communication Process and Outcome in Face-to-Face Versus Computerized Conferences." Human Communication Research 13, 225-52.


  • Hiltz, Starr Roxanne, and Murray Turoff., (1978). The Network Nation: Human Communication via Computer. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.


  • Hlebec, V., Manfreda, K. L., & Vehovar, V. (2006). The social support networks of Internet users. New Media & Society, 8, 9-32.


  • Hobman, E. V., Bordia, P., Irmer, B., & Chang, A. (2002). The expression of conflict in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Small Group Research, 33, 439-465.


  • Hof, Robert D., Browder, Seanna, and Elstrom, Peter, (1997). Internet Communities, Business Week, May 5, (1997).


  • Holme, P., Edling, C. R., & Liljeros, F. (2004). Structure and time evolution of an Internet dating community. Social Networks, 26, 155-174.



  • Holt, T. J. (2007). Subcultural evolution? Examining the influence of on- and off-line experiences on deviant subcultures. Deviant Behavior, 28, 171-198.


  • Hoogenboom, T., Kloos, M., Bouman, W., Jansen, R. (2007). Sociality and learning in social software, in: Special Issue of International Journal of Knowledge and Learning (IJKL), (http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=42&year=2007&vol=3&issue=4/5) "Learning and Interacting in the Web: Social networks and Social Software in the Web 2.0". Guest Editors: Miltiadis D. Lytras, Sheizaf Rafaeli, Stephen Downes, Ambjorn Naeve and Patricia Ordonez de Pablos. Volume 3, Nos 4/5, pp. 501-514.



  • Hospers, H. J., Harterink, P., Van Den Hoek, K., & Veenstra, J. (2002). Chatters on the Internet: A special target group for HIV prevention. AIDS Care, 14, 539-544.


  • Howard, P. E. N., Rainie, L., & Jones, S., (2001 to be published in November issue). Days and nights on the Internet: The impact of a diffusing technology. American Behavioral Scientist.


  • Hrastinski, S. (2007). Using chat as a complement to discussion board in small-group online seminars: How is student participation affected? in: Special Issue of International Journal of Knowledge and Learning (IJKL), (http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=42&year=2007&vol=3&issue=4/5) "Learning and Interacting in the Web: Social networks and Social Software in the Web 2.0". Guest Editors: Miltiadis D. Lytras, Sheizaf Rafaeli, Stephen Downes, Ambjorn Naeve and Patricia Ordonez de Pablos. Volume 3, Nos 4/5, pp. 483-500.



  • Hunt, Courteny Shelton and Howard E. Aldrich, (1998). The second Ecology: Creation and evolution of organizational communities, Research in Organizational Behavior, 20, 267-301.


  • Hynes, A. (2002). The Internet and the large group: Technological possibilities in a new age. Group Analysis, 35, 153-164.


  • Ishii, K., & Ogasahara, M. (2007). Links between real and virtual networks: A comparative study of online communities in Japan and Korea. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10, 252-257.



Retrieved from "http://www.wsefer.com/VC/index.php/Research_Articles_on_Virtual_Communities_%28E_to_I%29"
Personal tools